This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Worse code after bbro?

From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <senthilkumar dot selvaraj at microchip dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:09:52 -0600
Subject: Re: Worse code after bbro?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <87zijpcysb.fsf@microchip.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1701041003130.5294@t29.fhfr.qr> <20170104104656.GE28613@gate.crashing.org> <8a671034-cdc4-3129-b1e4-8e066cc38892@redhat.com> <20170105183921.GB27405@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 07:39:21PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> In fact cfglayout was invented to implement bb-reorder originally :)

So, hrm, are there any passes we *want* to do in non-cfglayout mode?


Segher

References:
- Re: Worse code after bbro?
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: Worse code after bbro?
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: Worse code after bbro?
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Worse code after bbro?
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]