This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: .../lib/gcc/<triplet>/7.1.1/ vs. .../lib/gcc/<triplet>/7/
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, nd at arm dot com
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:11:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: .../lib/gcc/<triplet>/7.1.1/ vs. .../lib/gcc/<triplet>/7/
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20170106124826.GJ21933@tucnak> <586F968B.2010301@arm.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 01:07:23PM +0000, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 06/01/17 12:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > SUSE and some other distros use a hack that omits the minor and patchlevel
> > versions from the directory layout, just uses the major number, it is very
>
> what is the benefit?
Various packages use the paths to gcc libraries/includes etc. in various
places (e.g. libtool, *.la files, etc.). So any time you upgrade gcc
(say from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 or 6.2.0 to 6.2.1), everything that has those paths
needs to be rebuilt. By having only the major number in the paths (which is
pretty much all that matters), you only have to rebuild when the major
version of gcc changes (at which time one usually want to mass rebuild
everything anyway).
Jakub