This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [IMPORTANT] slots assigned
- From: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:12:21 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] slots assigned
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <874mb4h9st dot fsf at foo dot bar dot baz>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> We got 18 slots from Google.
> It is less than we expected so not everyone is going to be satisfied by
> the split below.
> We have time until next week (deadline April 20, 2016 at 20:59 CEST)
> to assign mentors to each project, but to give us time to review things,
> please do this as soon as possible. Please directly notify me off-list
> when you have assigned the mentors so I can check that in the web
> interface (I have not found a way in the new interface to look up this
> information without going through all the proposals).
> For each proposal, please be sure there is only one mentor assigned to
> it and that each project has total proposals with a mentor == Assigned
> I have assigned these slots based on the number of mentors available for
> each project, but if you feel like giving away any slot to another
> project, please do it.
> Name: GCC
> Assigned: 2
So it looks like we need to scrap one of the three GCC proposals
(currently all have Mentors "assigned" - well, not sure if
"want to mentor" counts as assigned).
There's the GIMPLE FE, Addressing mode selection and replacing
libiberty with gnulib.
To me the last one is least interesting (no observable effect to
users or developers).