This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Graphite header order
- From: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- To: sven dot verdoolaege at gmail dot com
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Sebastian Pop <s dot pop at samsung dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "isl-development at googlegroups dot com" <isl-development at googlegroups dot com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:31:36 -0600
- Subject: Re: Graphite header order
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGWvny=BkUVoJkv8hzkCpQfUeuuOxjBCHLVBuHkgAfYS3FNwwQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFk3UF_BW1i+oJm_f561+XfVPNKZYebk7fDeMdhN8TkbDm7c2Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20151120162353 dot GY26264MdfPADPa at purples dot kotnet dot org>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Sven Verdoolaege <skimo-isl@kotnet.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:14:47AM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:31 AM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Sebastian,
>> >
>> > I have tried to build GCC with Graphite and ISL on AIX and encountered
>> > two problems:
>> >
>> > (1) isl/ctx.h
>> >
>> > typedef enum {
>> > isl_stat_error = -1,
>> > isl_stat_ok = 0,
>> > } isl_stat;
>> >
>> > GCC complains about the comma in "isl_stat_ok = 0,". This seems like
>> > a general bug that should appear on all targets.
>>
>> Sven, is there a way to fix this problem in ISL 0.15?
>
> Which version of gcc complains about the comma and why does it complain?
> AFAIU, the final comma is perfectly valid in C99.
On my system, gcc is compiled by g++ -std=gnu++98, then bootstrap uses
-std=gnu++11.
Sebastian