This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Results from SPEC2006 FP analysis done at Richard`s request {late July / early August}

From: Alan Lawrence <alan dot lawrence at arm dot com>
To: Abe <abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:49:58 +0100
Subject: Re: Results from SPEC2006 FP analysis done at Richard`s request {late July / early August}
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <55CBF39A dot 6020109 at yahoo dot com>

Abe wrote:

Dear all,

Overall, I think the WIP new if converter is holding up
relatively well, but there is obviously opportunity to do better,
at least if the numbers mean what they look like they mean,
i.e. the old converter`s code was fully OK and so is the new one`s.
By "fully OK" I mean e.g. no crashing bugs were introduced by the conversion.


In the following, all the integers over 1000 are loops-vectorized counts.

Interesting, thanks. For what kind of architecture are these - specifically:with/out masked/gathering loads/stores ??


Cheers, Alan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Results from SPEC2006 FP analysis done at Richard`s request {late July / early August}
  - From: Abe Skolnik

References:
- Results from SPEC2006 FP analysis done at Richard`s request {late July / early August}
  - From: Abe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]