This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 6/30/2015 1:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Zinovy Nis wrote:It works properly but I noticed that code the size for many arithmetic functions is much more larger than for soft-fp emulation provided by LLVM's compiler_rt library.Code size is discussed in the paper about soft-fp in the 2006 Summit proceedings. In general, soft-fp is optimized for speed (having completely separate "if" cases for addition and subtraction, both of which appear in both __addsf3 and __subsf3, for example) and for generality (it's used in the Linux kernel for floating-point emulation, where you want to follow the same choice of NaN etc. as a particular processor even where IEEE semantics don't specify a particular choice, and it has optional support for floating-point exceptions and rounding modes - note that __float128 support in libgcc uses the hardware exceptions and rounding modes when available), not for size (and generality takes precedence over speed where they conflict, hence being a bit slower than ieeelib even after the 2006 optimization work). soft-fp is expected to be used on 32-bit and 64-bit systems for which a few kB code size is insignificant.Size is very important for IA MCU. Would it be acceptable to update soft-fp to optimize for size with #ifdef __OPTIMIZE_SIZE__ #else #endif
I don't dispute that optimizing for size would probably be wise on any x86 CPU that needs soft-float. They are all relatively slow. But posted measurements of size and speed impact of doing this would be appreciated. Unless I slept through it getting removed, the rtems targets never dropped the lower end i386 to keep legacy hardware supported. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |