devbranches: ambigous characterisation of branches

[Wolfgang Hospital <WolfgaNg dot Hospital at arcor dot de>]

Dear Sir or Madam,

in the repository contents description at 
<https://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html#olddevbranches>, numerous branch names are 
listed as inactive, with some further comments. Right at the start there 
is the longest list of such names, followed by "These branches have been 
merged into the mainline.". Without "preceding" or "following",
or at least leading dash or a trailing colon, I'm at a loss whether that 
refers to the branches named before or after.
(The somewhat formal address contributed to landing this message
in the SPAM pit? Dear me.)

Yours faithfully

Wolfgang Hospital

--
Wolfgang Hospital