This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

From: Olaf van der Spek <olaf at xwis dot net>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:44:36 +0100
Subject: Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <549C3B3B dot 7030100 at xwis dot net> <CAH6eHdTkWYU6ha4KV8eibwyd_vaXrv6z1ofQtrPKDGhocRiKLQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <549F4A0D dot 20808 at xwis dot net> <CAH6eHdRr661EsTk1Tc4-u0ZK1d8wkW3iwTgiDojUV2fz-Ehp3Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <54A17471 dot 1060903 at verizon dot net> <CAH6eHdRcHYLY-KY=Et0GC+mw4jhj2pw+71Yc7Y9xPjL3hSdSGw at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 29-12-2014 18:36, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

On 29 December 2014 at 15:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:

The note on C++14 conformance referred to is not the place for this but: is
our C++11 support really less tested and more experimental than our C++03
support at this point?  One thing I can think of might be gcc bootstrap.


The main difference is ABI stability, which is not guaranteed for
C++11 (but should be once the std::string changes and resulting churn
settle down).


Is std::string still being fixed? Will that fix be part of 5.0?
Are ABI concerns holding back other things as well?

Olaf

References:
- 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
  - From: Olaf van der Spek
- Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
  - From: Olaf van der Spek
- Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
  - From: Ed Smith-Rowland
- Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]