This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:59:01 -0600
Subject: Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <87r3z33g2q dot fsf at kepler dot schwinge dot homeip dot net>

On 09/22/14 08:06, Thomas Schwinge wrote:

Hi!

As has been noted before,
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3Cyddhabgief1.fsf%40lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE%3E>,
GCC's MAINTAINERS file does not list a maintainer for libcilkrts, or
GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally.  Shouldn't it?  I regularely
consult this file when reporting issues in specific parts of the GCC code
base.

The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, hisassignment within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have timeto work on Cilk+ anymore.

Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+maintenance/bugfixing and it might make sense for him to own it in thelong term if he's interested.


jeff

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
  - From: Zamyatin, Igor

References:
- Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
  - From: Thomas Schwinge

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]