This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

combination of read/write and earlyclobber constraint modifier


Vladimir,

There are a few patterns which use both the read/write constraint modifier (+) and the earlyclobber constraint modifier (&):
...
$ grep -c 'match_operand.*+.*&' gcc/config/*/* | grep -v :0
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md:1
gcc/config/arc/arc.md:1
gcc/config/arm/ldmstm.md:30
gcc/config/rs6000/spe.md:8
...

F.i., this one in gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md:
...
(define_insn "vec_pack_trunc_<mode>"
 [(set (match_operand:<VNARROWQ2> 0 "register_operand" "+&w")
       (vec_concat:<VNARROWQ2>
         (truncate:<VNARROWQ> (match_operand:VQN 1 "register_operand" "w"))
         (truncate:<VNARROWQ> (match_operand:VQN 2 "register_operand" "w"))))]
...

The documentation ( https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Modifiers.html#Modifiers ) states:
...
'‘&’ does not obviate the need to write ‘=’.
...
which seems to state that '&' implies '='.

An earlyclobber operand is defined as 'modified before the instruction is finished using the input operands'. AFAIU that would indeed exclude the possibility that the earlyclobber operand is an input/output operand it self, but perhaps I misunderstand.

So my question is: is the combination of '&' and '+' supported ? If so, what is the exact semantics ? If not, should we warn or give an error ?

Thanks,
- Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]