This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps
- From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend at gmail dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:22:20 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAJXstsAXoGY+hbH=LpVAB2MmV+6HnfZpQ7jbWkAN7MzQR7Qc+Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc1cYbaRQTQyZuShu3q+PmEJ4A-E5ua4nYANDHNCJ9_fPQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc3mfE8FvxVih4XbOJvpdEVSOATGeaVkhUvqighcjvgMsA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAJXstsDzBCrLu0QYfuqwOXy5TEDdCbAR1CZicLpmXvQR+MLwGQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc3tCV4xHDv7FJdEzwXiN4s4=zEcFYyx5jQnpL4hsyKQ_g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc1M85ofSmQcTiQkH24jH-fvR2qxVmvVMJOH-cfNg+MTqw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc17dJ4ex=LSF0b7NA3P1KoRRsoLBHr5ef_d9BaHuQ98Mg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc176_S7iXwTrq_a_drbY97=dEzg0NTGMZ9Z08PD+MAE5Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAJXstsBtu4ZadAF6+hkBf43hYHsCTZMCW51Q0vNE_0ek_irRgA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc22S5-m2U_EoYM1TLXERn1sYcX-NmOzgyWdkp9Tw2GFmg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAJXstsCDQ6KRR+xi8vD=3-C=VfSCoDF_ab6bhZ7SRU9K+-f0pA at mail dot gmail dot com> <35e3244a-4455-489d-bb88-2709035c94b4 at email dot android dot com> <CAJXstsDMTn5_Yuio+Z=-DxB52qCZME iCZOx3K_Kb3MRbE654Cg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc36-QBCuq5Si6b5+FYrGbQNTomveA=M5yF17wJqE7kCQw at mail dot gmail dot com>
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> For
>
> (match_and_simplify
> (MINUS_EXPR @2 (PLUS_EXPR@2 @0 @1))
> @1)
Btw, this just triggered my eye. So with lumping the predicate to the
capture without special separator syntax, it means that there's a
difference between "minus_expr @2" and "minus_expr@2" with a meaningful
whitespace (despite 'r' and '@' already being a natural word boundary),
which seems less than ideal. Just mentioning :)
Ciao,
Michael.