This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: LLVM collaboration?
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: Renato Golin <renato dot golin at linaro dot org>
- Cc: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:48:49 -0500
- Subject: Re: LLVM collaboration?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMSE1kdfpeLp6NEc+jnEWqi0KWV-+=Q701UsiLhgcn13X6fYcA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMSE1ke32x19T07uidRJWiOpYDs3eSnKEL3u_dDHxBHJQR84cg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAD_=9DSZs=H3=GJnkv1VOaNi01FnSM4o7mb_51QwHZgs1BW7LQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMSE1kckPt0Tr4qTCG3W-HQ31EsaZPFOMbqyOW6zO86oGWTuAg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin@linaro.org> wrote:
> * GCC and LLVM collaboration / The Open Source Compiler Initiative
>
> With LLVM mature enough to feature as the default toolchain in some
> Unix distributions, and with the inherent (and profitable) share of
> solutions, ideas and code between the two, we need to start talking at
> a more profound level. There will always be problems that can't be
> included in any standard (language, extension, or machine-specific)
> and are intrinsic to the compilation infrastructure. For those, and
> other common problems, we need common solutions to at least both LLVM
> and GCC, but ideally any open source (and even closed source)
> toolchain. In this BoF session, we shall discuss to what extent this
> collaboration can take us, how we should start and what are the next
> steps to make this happen.
Looks good. Registered.
Thanks. Diego.