This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: proposal to make SIZE_TYPE more flexible
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:58:00 -0500
- Subject: Re: proposal to make SIZE_TYPE more flexible
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <201310300422 dot r9U4M6Mx002568 at greed dot delorie dot com> <201311222118 dot rAMLIxag003002 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311230039030 dot 12354 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312100334 dot rBA3YwMq017441 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1312101709200 dot 15324 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312201947 dot rBKJlgKS003922 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1312202151510 dot 29339 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312202159 dot rBKLxmIZ007173 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1312202215280 dot 29339 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312202240 dot rBKMeVfM008400 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1312210100330 dot 29339 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk > <201401090031 dot s090VGm9003938 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401090214160 dot 8625 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk > <201401090322 dot s093Mr4t007903 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401091540270 dot 21172 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot ! uk> <201401142222 dot s0EMMIKG032612 at greed dot delorie dot com> <201401282139 dot s0SLde3P006709 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401282151160 dot 2449 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
> Repost on the patches list (with self-contained write-up, rationale for
> choices made, etc.) at the start of stage 1 for 4.10/5.0,
Ok.
> I suggest (this clearly isn't stage 3 material).
Yup. Would be nice to back port it to 4.9 later, but... understood.