This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
- From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- To: Lars Hagström <lars at foldspace dot nu>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:26:07 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABUYEh9Rvwg7mu1GfP8bCoGveSR=UDpxd2QSBH8fr_6bPArzcg at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Wrong list, please send any follow-ups to gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org only.
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Lars Hagström wrote:
I'm wondering whether GCC 4.9 will switch to -std=gnu++11 as default?
No. This is asked regularly, google should find the answer easily.
I got an error that implies that "auto" is not usable, which would
mean that C++11 is not enabled, but I also got a warning that implied
that gnu++11 is "enabled by default".
error: ‘xdir’ does not name a type
warning: non-static data member initializers only available with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 [enabled by default]
Or does the "enabled by default" bit mean something other than I think it means?
It is the warning that is enabled by default (in other messages you would
see [-Wunused] or [-Wformat] etc to tell you which option controls this
warning).
--
Marc Glisse