This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: build broken on ppc linux?!
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin dot s dot serebryany at gmail dot com>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google dot com>, gcc List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:13:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: build broken on ppc linux?!
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5376FADB-7E9F-45C6-8F47-F1F2EA15374C at comcast dot net> <CAGWvnykYv04xQ0c1fEco6N82pPTg9=TC_uCnCJ4v88NF-VWR4w at mail dot gmail dot com> <1385068635 dot 4783 dot 24 dot camel at otta> <CAH6eHdQjd84fGHrxSOgfZaNpspH=2u0M35k5AWSH9Dfmk-YG-Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc2BjL4WMNE9_U2xsRhuaVCexcuUZTmuf53wb9=ZztRoUQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131122114717 dot GA24139 at adacore dot com> <20131122115600 dot GZ892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <CAGQ9bdx9b1ct2U9uBwHXjR8aC=eQ3dbGqSqad9FQnqEi9Ek2Pw at mail dot gmail dot com> <261983A2-AB51-4109-B39B-E2BA4C622358 at comcast dot net>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:11:18AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebryany@gmail.com> wrote:
> > These CFI directives were completely removed in upstream at
> > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=192196&view=rev
> > Strangely, this did not get into the last merge...
> >
> > Anyway, these cfi_* will (should, at least) disappear with the next
> > merge which I hope to do in ~ 1 week.
> > (Or anyone is welcome to delete these now as a separate commit, but
> > please make sure the code matches the one in upstream)
>
> This is exactly the patch referenced in the pointer to the upstream repo. Arno, does this fix the build for you?
>
> Ok?
Yes (though, I really wonder why it needs to be removed rather than only
conditionally added based on preprocessor macros, but that is a question
for upstream).
Jakub