This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Replace Java with Go in default languages
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:55:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Replace Java with Go in default languages
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <527D63DB dot 3090801 at redhat dot com> <2048994 dot lkYrU0NlsW at polaris> <52832119 dot 2010708 at redhat dot com>
> Across 10 runs we came in right at 70 minutes with the usual ~20 second
> variance. So it's slightly slower than the default languages right now.
> That doesn't help the cycle time for developers which was the major
> point for me.
Your results still look a little strange to me...
> As for Ada, I'm wondering if we should add it into the default
> languages, but not require it for the bootstrap/regression test cycle
> during stage1, but require it as we leave stage1. Thus, if a developer
> has Ada installed, it'll build & test by default.
>
> And, yes I'm aware of the wonderful irony that I'm debugging a bootstrap
> problem with Ada related to my recent work :-)
>
> Thoughts on the updated proposal?
IMO we need a non-call-exception language in the default mix, whatever it is.
--
Eric Botcazou