This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question about overloaded operators

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:55:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Question about overloaded operators
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A49D122 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com>

On 11/10/2013 11:08 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:

In C++, when a binary/unary operator is overloaded, then the build_x_[binary/unary]_op replaces it with a call expression. Is there  a way to know from the call expression (assume we are in the gimplification stage) what the operator is? I tried to look around but I didn't find any obvious way to figure this info out.

Not a simple one. You might factor out the code for that inwrite_unqualified_id into a separate function.


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Question about overloaded operators
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V

References:
- Question about overloaded operators
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]