This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [x86-64 psABI]: Extend x86-64 psABI to support AVX-512


On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:12:57PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> By the way, I do have another horrible idea for how you could do it.
> glibc's jmp_buf is actually a sigjmp_buf and contains 120 wasted bytes
> of sigset_t for nonexistant HURD signals. So you could store a few
> registers after the actually-used part of the sigset_t.

And another, possibly more acceptable way to do it:

#define setjmp(x) __new_setjmp(x, (__new_jmp_buf){0}, sizeof(__new_jmp_buf))

This would allocate the extra space on the caller's stack with a
lifetime equivalent to the validity lifetime of the jmp_buf, so it
should be valid, but I'm not sure if it covers all the needed cases
for interaction between old code and new code.

Rich


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]