This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC talks at the GNU Hackers Meeting?
- From: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu dot com>
- To: Luca Saiu <positron at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Philip Herron <redbrain at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, GHM discussion list <ghm-discuss at gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:36:56 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCC talks at the GNU Hackers Meeting?
- References: <87li60q4io dot fsf at kronrod dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <CABOHX+daE4wmKUiU+VhiZgQSGpr7UtUWbgYu=27ZqPRgZWb09A at mail dot gmail dot com> <87mwqfo5ty dot fsf at kronrod dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <CABOHX+e4rnsme9=d5jdgA+JxqTQx5gJg+sRM7Q9tQ6H=QN03Ew at mail dot gmail dot com> <87a9mfo1dc dot fsf at kronrod dot saclay dot inria dot fr>
On 24 June 2013 18:38, Luca Saiu <positron@gnu.org> wrote:
> On 2013-06-24 at 19:14, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> My talk at Dconf2013 can be bulleted into the following:
>>
>> - What is GDC?
>> - A brief history of porting the D language to GCC.
>> - D language and library support, including current challenges being faced.
>> - Introduction to GCC, in particular an overview of the compilation
>> process from GENERIC down to RTL and how things tie in with the D
>> front end.
>> - Taking advantage of the GCC backend. What features of GCC are
>> leveraged by the D front end (eg: builtin functions, extended
>> assembler)
>> - Future goals and architecture support.
>
> Cool for me. If we have Philip's talk as well then part of your fourth
> point might become redundant, but it's quite small fraction of the talk.
>
> Of course you can reuse slides. We all do :-).
>
As I said, I can rehash some of what was gone over and perhaps focus
more on challenges of representing the D language within GCC. (Eg:
Delegates, Thunks, TLS symbols and D runtime...)
>> Have registered myself. I'll have to confirm my availability.
>
> Oh, sorry. I'm marking your name as "to be confirmed" then.
>
No problem mate, I'll let you know as soon as possible.
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';