This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 06/01/2013 11:45 AM, Jens Taprogge wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote:On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:16:49PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:On 05/31/2013 04:42 PM, Jens Taprogge wrote:On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 02:14:47PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:Ok. None of this is yet making any sense to me. (And I worry enumerating all the mix and match of configs that work or don't only blurs the issues). Few base questions: 1) What distro is this on?arch linux2) What gcc version are you using?gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20130502 (prerelease)(Sorry, I'm not very familiar with arch) Are you able to also install a 4.7 gcc in parallel to try to build with? If so, you might want to try that. Your results are just weird enough I want to just be sure we're not chasing compiler caused ghosts.I will compile gcc4.6 and see if using that makes any difference.I have compiled two of the broken configurations with gcc-4.6 and both boot up. I am not sure how to proceed from here.
Ok. That at least helps make me feel better that I'm not just crazy.First thing, I'd probably file a bug against the Arch gcc 4.8 package, just in case there's any out-of-tree changes there.
I've also added the gcc mailing list to the thread to see if someone there can help narrow down what might be going wrong.
thanks -john
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |