This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at googlers dot com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:56:20 -0600
Subject: Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
References: <8af2b2f3-835d-4542-be95-725e52ae9955@email.android.com> <1763898977.50770587.1354212724086.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Assuming that the new implementation will be available in time for 4.9, my primary concern is that in the meanwhile running the libstdc++ testsuite will be quite noticeably slower. Do you have some numbers?
>
>
> Just use the numbers I used the last two times I tried to explain why PCH was useful to Diego!
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/PCHHaters

where is the +1 button for the handwriting?

-- Gaby

> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompilationSpeed
>
> The proposal to remove a useful feature before implementing a replacement was absurd on face value and I'm glad it's been taken off the table.
>
> Sheesh.
>
> -benjamin

References:
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]