This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8

From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple dot com>
To: Miles Bader <miles at gnu dot org>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at googlers dot com>, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple dot com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:40:54 -0800
Subject: Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
References: <CAD_=9DTupnSYx7zYLPMD2S41fkL=dWuhkszJoXmpH53_DF5nMQ@mail.gmail.com> <3251442.OBpRSmT4Cl@polaris> <26428EE2-D15E-4996-BC7A-C66A52F17E30@apple.com> <87sj7uwc03.fsf@catnip.gol.com>

On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:

> Chris Lattner <clattner@apple.com> writes:
>> Clang has fantastic support for PCH... and soon modules.  We don't
>> plan to drop PCH support when modules is implemented.
> 
> Do you have a pointer to the modules proposal clang will implement?

Most of it is implemented in mainline Clang already.  Here is a recent talk describing it:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/Gregor-Modules.pdf

Doug is also the chair of the C++ working group on modules, leading the effort to standardize it (along with Lawrence and others).

-Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
  - From: Xinliang David Li

References:
- RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8
  - From: Miles Bader

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]