This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: basile at starynkevitch dot net
Cc: davidxl at google dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 07:03:33 EST
Subject: Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype
References: <CAAkRFZJzksJVZm7yjkSGai6C57J3Q9EdkfkMz9T6kp1kAS+oDw@mail.gmail.com> <20121117083536.GA23336@ours.starynkevitch.net>

> First, C or C++ is not the best language to write a compiler in, 

It is my strong opinion that the best language to write a compiler in is
the language that it is compiling (or the primary language in the case
of a multi-language compiler like GCC).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

References:
- Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]