This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:40:43 +0100
Subject: Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC)
References: <CABu31nPnuk57bnuVswvtUA667iHZqs7i1s_fFo0yZfRMUX+HDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOQZ8xk_1BUq8j5uK7eVpWnprx_ebis8uN1sOU6jr247jF7LA@mail.gmail.com> <xnobjb30z6.fsf@greed.delorie.com>

Il 06/11/2012 03:43, DJ Delorie ha scritto:
> Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> writes:
>> > Also the fact that GCC is now written in C++ seems to me to be
>> > deserving of a bump to 5.0.
> I see no reason why an internal design change that has no user visible
> effects should have any impact on the version number.

Technically, requiring a C++ compiler to bootstrap is a user visible effect.

Paolo

References:
- Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC)
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC)
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]