This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr45453.C time out

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:05:36 +0100
Subject: Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr45453.C time out
References: <5091330A.10403@oracle.com> <CAFiYyc3cPxu-+OSaKfDyhWi5pEcWUh0-fvZQZJPciqyrK2NCYA@mail.gmail.com> <20121031143928.GE19020@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20121031150402.GF19020@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

The problem is that with new costs and new code for inlining functions called once
we end up inlining empty virutal function to itself hoping to kill it.
I am testing the following that makes us to give up in such a werid case.

Thanks!

Paolo.

References:
- g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr45453.C time out
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr45453.C time out
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr45453.C time out
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr45453.C time out
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]