This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap broken on rs6000


I thought Steven was going to do that. If not, I can apply it.

Thanks,
Sharad
Sharad


On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is someone going to apply this patch?
>
> Thanks, David
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Sharad Singhai <singhai@google.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> ../../trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c: In function 'void
>>> rs6000_density_test(rs6000_cost_data*)':
>>> ../../trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c:3550:32: error: 'dump_kind_p'
>>> was not declared in this scope
>>>
>>> This is due to:
>>>
>>> 2012-10-24  Sharad Singhai  <singhai at google dot com>
>>>
>>>         * dumpfile.c (dump_enabled_p): Make it inline and move the definition
>>>         to dumpfile.h.
>>>         (dump_kind_p): Deleted. Functionality replaced by dump_enabled_p.
>>>         Make alt_dump_file extern.
>>>         * dumpfile.h (dump_enabled_p): Move inline definition here.
>>>         (dump_kind_p): Delete declaration.
>>>         ...
>>>
>>> It's kinda nice to check target code as well when changing things... ;-)
>>
>> Sorry about that. Will do so in future.
>>
>>> Is the change at the bottom of this email correct?
>>
>> Yes, that is correct. If there are any more instances of dump_kind_p
>> (), they should be replaced by dump_enabled_p () as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sharad
>>
>>>
>>> Ciao!
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>> Index: config/rs6000/rs6000.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- config/rs6000/rs6000.c      (revision 192780)
>>> +++ config/rs6000/rs6000.c      (working copy)
>>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@ rs6000_density_test (rs6000_cost_data *data)
>>>        && vec_cost + not_vec_cost > DENSITY_SIZE_THRESHOLD)
>>>      {
>>>        data->cost[vect_body] = vec_cost * (100 + DENSITY_PENALTY) / 100;
>>> -      if (dump_kind_p (MSG_NOTE))
>>> +      if (dump_enabled_p ())
>>>         dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
>>>                          "density %d%%, cost %d exceeds threshold, penalizing "
>>>                          "loop body cost by %d%%", density_pct,


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]