This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Libgcc and its license

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Gabor Loki <loki at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, nickc at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:53:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Libgcc and its license
References: <50751F2A.1010905@gcc.gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210101439160.17002@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <5075C220.4010601@adacore.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210102014290.24563@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 10/10/2012 4:16 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

I'm not talking about the relation between the headings textually located
in a source file and the license of that source file.  I'm talking about
the relation between the license of a .o file and the license of .h files
#included at several levels of indirection from the .c source that was
compiled to that .o file (in particular, headers included within tm.h, but
most or all of the content of which is irrelevant for code being built for
the target).

Right, I understand, but that gets messy quickly!

References:
- Libgcc and its license
  - From: Gabor Loki
- Re: Libgcc and its license
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Libgcc and its license
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Libgcc and its license
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]