This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: reverse bitfield patch

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:38:47 -0400
Subject: Re: reverse bitfield patch
References: <201210022207.q92M7NSk032449@greed.delorie.com> <CAFiYyc2sCvqJhMh5nFjjdBJUJhRW_EiX5_iOyt1m=3zEZ+anzQ@mail.gmail.com>

> ChangeLog missing, new functions need a toplevel comment documenting
> function, argument and return value as per coding conventions.

Any review of the patch itself?  I know the overhead is not there...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: reverse bitfield patch
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- reverse bitfield patch
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: reverse bitfield patch
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]