This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Just a general clarification (maybe obvious, but who knows): when a paper is listed on that page, it's just the paper corresponding to our *initial* implementation of the feature. Thus, in general, that number does *not* mean that the following changes - in papers, then in the published Standard (which is the most important reference now) + resolutions of DRs - are not reflected in our actual implementation. In general, I would say that the viceversa is true. That said, that Bugzilla PR stands, I'm not disagreeing with the specific analysis there, it's just matter for the people working on the C++ front-end to resolve it (as for any other valid PR).The C++11 support page (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html) lists decltype support as 'Yes' but with reference only to the old N3243.
Thanks, Paolo.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |