This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: assemble code and disassembled code in-consistency

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Feng LI <nemokingdom at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:25:18 -0700
Subject: Re: assemble code and disassembled code in-consistency
References: <CAPekQOruy3zHAj7yLKGhyWJrKabhd_AC=eUJSx9gXy91fXUVfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOoPRLk=oN7EOYiCrpuUq2dgVu30ZtqZaKhAEDYNcAXqmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPekQOrPMcQKQg6MgatHm6ufo2oRy_-77yg_BfBw7qTZuJfX5w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Feng LI <nemokingdom@gmail.com> wrote:
> So under x86_64 machine, I could do a
> Shl %rax 32 safely without being truncated?

Yes.

> Still , why the suffix q is removed in the disassembled code if they are the
> same?
>

You can get suffix by adding -Msuffix to objdump.

-- 
H.J.

References:
- assemble code and disassembled code in-consistency
  - From: Feng LI
- Re: assemble code and disassembled code in-consistency
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]