This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities

From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google dot com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:45:39 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
References: <4FF3458A.2050804@redhat.com> <4FF35DA9.2020405@redhat.com> <20120704061421.GC16471@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAFiYyc2bstAVhvrLYaAn-18+ZK3kYEBwic2jwLnZMNYC8yMX_g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1207041517430.16308@wotan.suse.de>

On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Michael Matz wrote:

> It will by the way not break unnoticed: interfaces using the problematic 
> types would be mangled differently, and hence c++98 code would silently 

... would _not_ silently ...

> be resolved to a c++11 variant expecting a different layout.

References:
- Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]