This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ARM GCC 4.8 test suite
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Sebastian Huber <sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:36:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: ARM GCC 4.8 test suite
- References: <4FE1DDE6.9050401@embedded-brains.de>
On 20/06/12 15:27, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe it makes sense to look at some test suite comments since now all non EABI
> configurations have been removed (is this correct?).
>
No, not quite. All configurations using the FPA have been removed.
That's not quite the same thing.
NetBSD is still supported (though it's not been tested in a while) and
that uses the ATPCS (or something quite close to it).
R.
> The problem was pointed out here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00950.html
>
> Here are some samples of the test suite (4.8-20120617):
>
> gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/vaarg2.C:// { dg-options "-Wno-abi" {
> target arm_eabi } }
>
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm1.C:// { dg-do compile { target
> arm*-*-eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf* } }
>
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm2.C:// { dg-do compile { target
> arm*-*-*eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf* } }
>
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm3.C:// { dg-do compile { target
> arm*-*-*eabi* } }
>
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/arm_va_list.C:// { dg-require-effective-target arm_eabi }
>
> Does it make sense to replace all "arm*-*-eabi*", "arm*-*-*eabi*", and
> "arm*-*-symbianelf*" combinations with "arm_eabi"?
>
I'll look at them when I get round to that part of the tools. There's
still some clean-up work in the main part of the compiler to finish
before I move onto other parts.
R.