This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert at iram dot es>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm dot net>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, "jyasskin at googlers dot com" <jyasskin at googlers dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:49:59 +0200
Subject: Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7
References: <684e2daa82dfe58f3c0ca7898a646503.squirrel@fuhm.net> <CAH6eHdQEciws3XiV_mbLDaL4OA3c1B91sYH1=3OOEsK8+NhhYQ@mail.gmail.com> <2f242c57969394ada4e4245513f247de.squirrel@fuhm.net> <CAAiZkiAB7d5pEaKwqjR=rVt=wDa8n=zQdegOZn8HWi+M1jc+zw@mail.gmail.com> <BDA15BC0-F41D-4EF4-A731-FDACFE6157FA@oracle.com> <20120615212311.GA25101@visitor2.iram.es>

Hi,

> Does this basically mean that compiling C++ code with GCC4.7 will be playing Russian roulette?

I don't know, I see pretty extreme statements around, which lately (maybe because I'm getting older? ;) I do my best to avoid. In any case, 4.7.1 is already out, whatever we do as regards to rolling out a completely new std::string implementation doesn't seem suited for a .2 release. Just my vote.


Paolo

References:
- Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7
  - From: James Y Knight
- Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: C++98/C++11 ABI compatibility for gcc-4.7
  - From: Gabriel Paubert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]