This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:24:00 -0400
Subject: Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++
References: <CAD_=9DRrko1uYG1t29i+D+=THwdVU5nSqnBvpP5X=CjrACifHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF1jjLv0NZAYtXmeuqjf-y2CYbEwbKdXysaEg_mmP7GFwBLPXA@mail.gmail.com> <4F8430A7.8010108@google.com> <CAF1jjLtYSVCiZYWBMbKLTVU3W4W_u7K=pWikqrcSae7VfPiCRw@mail.gmail.com>

On 12-06-15 12:42 , NightStrike wrote:

Took me a while, but I built a linux to win64 cross compiler using
--enable-build-with-cxx.

Thanks.

 How do I verify that the compiler was
actually built with g++?  ldd on the gcc binary?

That would work, yes. But do it on stage1-gcc/xgcc. The binaries in stage2-gcc/ and gcc/ are always built with C++.

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++
  - From: NightStrike

References:
- Re: RFH - Testing targets for the switch to C++
  - From: NightStrike

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]