This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends

From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:47:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends
References: <CABu31nPyeAW8_5o9+acP4A6_OCKhRJxY-_rLF6CQr5tjeVUcPg@mail.gmail.com> <201206050757.14375.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <CABu31nP2teEBjmSH75ptCzQxB52oMsed=Mj1fVPZS9AW2_y6dw@mail.gmail.com> <201206051307.13140.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:

>> The same happens for rs6000-ibm-aix6.1, which also doesn't have
>> BSS_SECTION_ASM_OP, even though there should be BSS support for XCOFF
>> (http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/aix/v6r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.aix.
>>files%2Fdoc%2Faixfiles%2FXCOFF.htm).
>
> That's certainly more annoying on AIX than on Tru64.

BSS was a later addition and there is no ".bss" pseudo-op directive,
unlike the ".comm" directive. There only is the BSS storage class.

- David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [RFH] Uses of output.h in the front ends
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]