On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:24 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Honestly I care 1000 times more for existing GCC developers. Before
> new programmers will have an easier time with GCC_existing_ GCC
> developers will have to spend at least two GCC release cycles (that's
> very optimistic) turning the GCC codebase upside-down. Every
> existing GCC developer you lose on that way will slow down that
> process and for every existing GCC developer you probably need more
> that one "new" GCC developer starting.
>
> It's very easy for me to do the math and conclude that losing even_one_
> experienced existing GCC developer makes this whole transition-to-C++
> thing a non-starter.
I agree that less work-force in the transition would be a problem. But
is C++ (perceived to be) so bad that it would make people change their
jobs? I mean, we're not talking about the experienced hobbyists here,
or are we?