This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> - texinfo.tex is not required if a Texinfo source file is specified. The
> assumption is that the file will be supplied, but in a place that
> Automake cannot find. This assumption is an artifact of how Cygnus
> packages are typically bundled.
texinfo.tex is in a known location, but only a single copy for GDB and
binutils and a single copy for GCC rather than in each directory needing
it. Is the approach used (for example) in libquadmath/Makefile.am
TEXINFO_TEX = ../gcc/doc/include/texinfo.tex
considered a suitable approach for this case?
> - Certain tools will be searched for in the build tree as well as in the
> user's PATH. These tools are runtest, expect, makeinfo and texi2dvi.
I did previously suggest removing the existing support for building and
using these tools in-tree
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01674.html>, but there was
pushback on that. I don't know, however, if it actually depends on
anything built into automake.
> - The check target doesn't depend on all.
I'm not aware of a need for that.
Joseph S. Myers