This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 5 & modularity
On Mar 19, 2012 5:56 AM, "Basile Starynkevitch" wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:49:24 +0000
> Jonathan Wakely <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On 18 March 2012 16:56, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > >
> > > ? * a garbage collector. Even a modular GCC need some memory management policy (and
> > > ref-counting à la GTK, or à la std::shared_ptr is not enough IMHO inside a compiler
> > > because a compiler has much more complex and circular data structures, and much less
> > > hierarchically organized, that a graphical tookit has).
> > As has been pointed out to you before, shared_ptr is designed to be
> > useful even with circular structures. Please read about weak_ptr.
> Then why has it not being used before?
I don't understand the question. Are you asking why shared_ptr hasn't
been used in GCC before? Surely that's obvious, the GCC code is still
written in C and no C++ templates have been introduced to the code
Maybe shared_ptr isn't the right tool for memory management in GCC,
but if it's rejected then I hope it will be for valid reasons, not
because of misinformation about being unsuitable for code with