This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: The state of glibc libm

From: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Geert Bosch <bosch at adacore dot com>, Christoph Lauter <christoph dot lauter at lip6 dot fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:47:24 +0100
Subject: Re: The state of glibc libm
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1202291655580.7156@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20120314143045.GG3804@xvii.vinc17.org> <4F60B64D.1020606@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203141627170.22094@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4F60CA37.5070709@redhat.com> <m2mx7igbr9.fsf@firstfloor.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203142103530.21427@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 09:04:53PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > One big win alone on 32bit x86 would be to use a SSE ABI for libm
> > by default.
> 
> I haven't checked, but I'd hope x32 does that as a better 32-bit ABI for 
> newer x86 processors.

x32 is not a mainstream option.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The state of glibc libm
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Re: The state of glibc libm
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: The state of glibc libm
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: The state of glibc libm
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: The state of glibc libm
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: The state of glibc libm
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: The state of glibc libm
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]