This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Fwd: Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken?


?Yes,
? I replicated this on an Ubuntu 11 distro with GCC 4.6.x


On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Iyer, Balaji V <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com> wrote:
> Hello J. K.,
> ? ? ? ?Have you tried with a newer version of GCC? GCC 4.1 is pretty old....
>
> Thanks,
>
> Balaji V. Iyer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J K [mailto:jkwipub@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:31 AM
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken?
>
> ?Posted in the Intel forums but this may be more of a GCC issue.
> ?Please advise if I should post elsewhere.
>
> ?Compiling a C module in with a large app (>2GB data) and getting relocatable errors with GCC and ?not ICC.
>
> ./classification_dpr_BB.o: In function `BB_detection_dpr':
> /homedata/johnk/dpr/src_
> 20120126/DD2_V2.20120126/src/./
> classification_dpr_BB.c:118: relocation truncated to fit:
> R_X86_64_PC32 against `.bss'
>
> ?Can anyone familiar with the output of readelf see why the GCC
> ?object is not relocatable and the ICC one is? Would another tool
> ?be more suitable?
>
> icc -I../include -g -v -sox -fPIC -mcmodel=medium -DDEBUG ?-c ./classification_dpr_BB.c cc -I../include -g -v -fPIC -mcmodel=medium -DDEBUG ?-c ./classification_dpr_BB.c
>
> ? This module does not use more than 2GB data itself, I just need it to be linked with
> ? code that does, so -fPIC. ?I left off the medium memory model switch on both with no impact.
> ? Everything is static except for the -shared-intel -mcmodel=medium on the main link (ifort is used).
>
> ? Could it have something to do with the relocation types? Are there switches to GCC to force relocations
> ?like ICC?
>
> GCC
> Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0xd040 contains 449 entries:
> ?Offset ? ? ? ? ?Info ? ? ? ? ? Type ? ? ? ? ? Sym. Value ? ?Sym.
> Name + Addend
> 00000000004e ?001700000002 R_X86_64_PC32 ? ? 0000000000000000 .rodata
> + fffffffffffffffc
> 00000000008e ?000400000002 R_X86_64_PC32 ? ? 0000000000000000 .bss + 1e5c 0000000000bc ?000400000002 R_X86_64_PC32 ? ? 0000000000000000 .bss + 105c
>
>
> ICC
> Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0xf222 contains 732 entries:
> ?Offset ? ? ? ? ?Info ? ? ? ? ? Type ? ? ? ? ? Sym. Value ? ?Sym.
> Name + Addend
> 000000000030 ?00780000001a R_X86_64_GOTPC32 ?0000000000000000 _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ + fffffffffffffffc
> 000000000036 ?000600000019 R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 0000000000000000
> _2il0floatpacket.15 + 0
> 000000000057 ?000700000019 R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 0000000000000008
> _2il0floatpacket.16 + 0
> 00000000009f ?00780000001a R_X86_64_GOTPC32 ?0000000000000000 _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ + fffffffffffffffc
>
> gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51) icc (ICC) 11.1 20100806
>
> ?The full output of readelf -all are at these links.
>
> ICC
> http://www.box.com/s/2iqnqydmi0mdz52xs9ac
>
> GCC
> http://www.box.com/s/jjcgq1x2s5ybpg7s9b6g
>
> Thanks for any help.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]