This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: wish: generation of type annotation for C++11 code.


On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually in our case (as you know) we have SCARY iterators, so
> multimap::iterator is a typedef, and the actual type is
> std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const Foo, Bar>> which is even less
> useful to know!

Exactly.  One of the key reasons why we added "auto" to C++11
was NOT to mimic Hindley-Milner systems.  It was to abstract over
this type of noise.  People should not use "auto" just because they can,
or because it vaguely looks like something from a previously known
programming language, or because it is the new kid on the block.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]