This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries
- From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:35:29 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla components for target libraries
- References: <yddwrb8qfhl.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
> The entries in parens are only covered indirectly and may or may not
> warrant their own components. I'd argue that it would be helpful to
> have libada and libgo components of their own (while libcpp would
> probably be overkill), but of course that's ultimately up to the
> respective maintainers.
My gut feeling is that having a single ada component is sufficient and
having ada+libada wouldn't buy us much.
But if for e.g. consistency with other components people feel strongly
that we should have a separate libada component, that would be fine with
me.
Arno