This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics
- From: Kirill Yukhin <kirill dot yukhin at gmail dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 09:23:53 +0400
- Subject: Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics
- References: <20111101195742.GM1052@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <CAGs3RfvTOwbdDaXBFNmBYXfJNCRLwZEpN4P9XSrhYZC3XmcKvA@mail.gmail.com> <20111102095530.GP1052@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <CAGs3Rfs10gTNw=yMt5mqjOJ-DhKav=DTCymNFy05s5yBeJHofA@mail.gmail.com> <20111103102855.GX1052@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
Hello Jakub,
I've talked to our engineers, who work on vectorization in ICC
They all said, "yes you can optimize vpxor out both in f1 and f2"
Thanks, K
- References:
- _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics
- Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics
- Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics
- Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics
- Re: _mm{,256}_i{32,64}gather_{ps,pd,epi32,epi64} intrinsics semantics