This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sparc-rtems 4.6 vs 4.7
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- To: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 21:25:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: sparc-rtems 4.6 vs 4.7
- References: <4EB44797.3080301@oarcorp.com>
> Since it looks like a lot of the failures
> in both cases are lto, vect and stack-align
> tests, I suspect that of the ~3100 tests
> that were added, we have a number of new
> tests that won't work on when compiling
> specifically for an erc32 (-mcpu=cypress).
The results can hardly be analyzed, there are too many failures, although they
probably come from a small number of problems. You should consider looking
into the gazillions of execution failures, determining why they fail (they pass
on Solaris or Linux) and submit patches to XFAIL/SKIP them for sparc-rtems.
--
Eric Botcazou