This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Michael Haubenwallner <michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:10:43 +0000
Subject: Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?
References: <45937.10.0.66.17.1320081754.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org> <yddty6p9i4n.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <CAH6eHdSZW7Ke85crSX+Fnb6LmGaPzoFHUvhcwsPBs2sBrfnssg@mail.gmail.com> <4EB0E8AA.6030508@salomon.at> <CAH6eHdTAsxAVr+vSTBRftPmUpGTyMODS-tZtfwGLfqX-CWiThg@mail.gmail.com> <4EB14B2F.9000906@salomon.at>

On 2 November 2011 13:52, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
> Erm - what I want to say is that I would really wonder if it does have /any/
> influence (binary-wise) to gcc on Solaris (unlike Linux) whether to configure
> for i386 or i586 (via '--host' or even '--target').

http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html#x86 doesn't say it only
happens on GNU/Linux.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?
  - From: Michael Haubenwallner

References:
- Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?
  - From: Michael Haubenwallner
- Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?
  - From: Michael Haubenwallner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]