This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:52:55 -0500
Subject: Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
References: <4EAF2238.2090509@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc36P9zgqNGVbNJPp=O4fZgzAHOcmZHavJrWEJsttVdibg@mail.gmail.com> <4EB00EE3.1040806@redhat.com> <4EB019A4.7030700@google.com> <4EB03DFB.2040103@redhat.com> <4EB04153.2090809@redhat.com>

Have you looked at those diffs, there's a fair amount of unrelated

Will clean up.

crud in there...  It might help to break the blob into more easily
understood hunks for actual submissions.  ie, runtime bits (libitm),
changes to existing runtime stuff, compiler proper, testsuite bits, etc.

Will do.

References:
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Jeff Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]