This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:33:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
References: <4EAF2238.2090509@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc36P9zgqNGVbNJPp=O4fZgzAHOcmZHavJrWEJsttVdibg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGWvnykHtOBmq_BFfJVa48K2e7rO6S6to-fTmebQVE=sDMwHsQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EB02A3D.4090008@adacore.com> <CAD_=9DSsD3ZOnJCtp5WUHM0mEE1v=gpuhjpnJTK2UvDcu2EYrA@mail.gmail.com>

Richard who?  There are two Richards in this thread, and they seem to
have opposing views.


I am confused by the multiple levels of quotes I think (the feature
in mailers of easily allowing you to include an entire earlier thread
is evil! :-)

Anyway, I support merging this in ...

Diego.

References:
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Potentially merging the transactional-memory branch into mainline.
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]