This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++11 no longer experimental

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Oleg Endo <oleg dot endo at t-online dot de>, Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Nathan Ridge <zeratul976 at hotmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:06:08 -0400
Subject: Re: C++11 no longer experimental
References: <BLU162-W198148B0149AEE08F2A31D960D0@phx.gbl> <CAH6eHdRyQvh2eibPy+W8DELJu0_8ndqJbJYZ9Zd1KVGs=vpe2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdQ2eXmCZ5P7t189OiWiFCzWbtRRM3DtCc9RrpnuNBZ-Yw@mail.gmail.com> <20110921182543.GA31859@synopsys.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110301411500.3250@gerinyyl.fvgr> <1319983195.1806.4.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110302024030.3250@gerinyyl.fvgr>

On 10/30/2011 03:25 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

-<p><b>Important</b>: because the ISO C++0x draft is still evolving,
-  GCC's support for C++0x is<b>experimental</b>.  No attempt will be
-  made to maintain backward compatibility with implementations of
-  C++0x features that do not reflect the final C++0x standard.</p>
+<p><strong>Important</strong>: GCC's support for C++11 is still
+<strong>experimental</strong>.</p>

I'd keep the second sentence here. Otherwise it looks good.

Jason

References:
- Re: C++11 no longer experimental
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: C++11 no longer experimental
  - From: Oleg Endo
- Re: C++11 no longer experimental
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]