This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:49:45 -0500
Subject: Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
References: <20111018171201.361304028ab94f102f827bd2@starynkevitch.net> <CAH6eHdQLu6fJGBdY5PQbBLJj2MWdmM5YZVMUPJmMShLdWQtr+Q@mail.gmail.com> <20111018200320.d842f5352bbdccf961125857@starynkevitch.net> <CAH6eHdQ4rSVeb0tiPgtALOK=k7ZpSKX5LyP=x39n53TFE5H1eQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111018204814.3698eba52a792643291af49f@starynkevitch.net>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:

> So I thought that
> ?delete (p) p;
> actually called p->~C()
>

No.  This is one of the reasons why you should not read too much
into "manual storage management".  Most of the time, you don't have
to say delete.  And if you do, think twice.  I suspect that is the design
envisioned for GCC.

References:
- adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]