This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:36:08 -0700
Subject: Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
References: <20111018171201.361304028ab94f102f827bd2@starynkevitch.net> <mcr62jm5kcb.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20111018191350.470cd6b1cd291373d5ff3f2c@starynkevitch.net>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
>
> Still, I find strange that while some very smart & nice GCC guys want to get rid of Ggc,
> no patch made into the trunk towards that goal (which I Basile dislike and don't share,
> so don't expect me Basile to work on this.).

I've put a lot of work into making it possible to build gcc as a C++ program.

It's true that these things move slowly.  GCC has been around for many years,
and fundamental changes to it take years to implement.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

References:
- adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]